On Hershey’s PR Release of January, 30th 2012

Featured

On  January 31st  2012,  The Hershey Company made an announcement regarding child labor in their supply line.  Click here to read the whole statement.   Simply, two commitments have been made :

1.“Over the next five years, The Hershey Company will expand and accelerate programs to improve cocoa communities by investing $10 million  (Over the next 5 years) in West Africa and continuing to work with experts in agriculture, community development and government to achieve progress with cocoa farmers and their families”.

2. “Later this year, U.S. consumers will be able to purchase Hershey’s Bliss® products with 100 percent cocoa from Rainforest Alliance Certified farms. Rainforest Alliance Certified farms have met comprehensive sustainability standards that protect the environment and ensure the safety and well-being of workers, their families and communities.”

Let me first say that I commend Hershey’s on stepping up as far as they have.  Also, kudos to the NGO’s and people that put pressure on Hershey’s with various campaigns.   What though does this really mean?

So let’s look at commitment #1, the $10 million.  So that is $2 million a year.  If you read the recommendations in the 4th and Final Tulane Report you will see that this isn’t enough.  It really should be closer to $8 million a year per player (as in those that have signed the protocol).  The ICI alone needs $1 million a year for overhead alone so you get the idea.  But $2 million is more than zero.  I will address this later as more unfolds.

Commitment #2- Rain Forest Alliance.   Slave Free Chocolate is VERY pro Fair Trade Certified products.  Also, at this point, it’s the only tool that the consumer can use to vote with their dollar.   Simply, the principle behind the Fair Trade is a movement is to bring farmers and producers out of poverty by paying a higher price for their goods or commodities.  Along with a higher price comes a co-op system where the farmers and producers receive education and help so that they can afford to  fulfill the guidelines. These guidelines include rules of labor practices and in the case of children, the certification programs that align with the ILO convention 182.

Currently,  fair trade products amount to around $6 billion dollars of commodities and goods sold around the world and it is rising about 22% every year.  There are about 500 different fair trade labels.

Fair Trade programs though, don’t have in their infrastructure a program to re-mediate the worst forms of child labor.  Meaning, there are no funds allocated in a fair trade co-op to find trafficked children, get them to authorities and fund their trip back home or to someplace that will take care of them.  Although, ideally fair trade farms get paid more for their beans, it’s not enough of an increase to fund schools and hospitals for those kids working on these farms.  Also, fair trade co-ops provide guidelines for the farmers to better prosper but not to police the farms.

Is the fair trade movement today perfect?  No, nothing is. In fact, there is a lot of squabbling, splits and such going on right now.  The movement, though , is based on good intentions and their problems can and will be ironed out in time. More will be addressed in a different article.

What I want to point out it that buying fair trade beans is one thing, cleaning up the situation is West Africa is another.  Hershey’s soon to be announced Bliss Bar is all fine and dandy but it has nothing to do with getting these trafficked kids back home, getting the kids that fall under the worst forms of child labor back on a healthy track. That is what the $2 million is for and it is about 1/5 of where they need to be.  They know that.  They have copies of the 4th and Final Tulane report.

What we need is a certification program and/or Engel’s original legislation of “No Slavery Here” stamp that chocolate companies use in addition to their fair trade labels. Remember The Hershey Company is only one player in this.  We believe the quickest way to get everyone’s attention is to demand that the wording on EO13126 get’s fixed to included “And its derivative products.”

 

 

 

Valentine’s Day Campaign: Put some love in Executive Order 13126

Slave Free Chocolate’s new site is barely up but, we don’t want to waste time getting people geared up for this easy peasy campaign on Feb. 13th and 14th.  We are looking for collaborators to help us outreach to their own networks and ask them to participate.  There is static page on this site with this same content. If you would like to draw people to your site for the content, feel free to grab anything below.

In 1999 the US Department of Labor issued Executive Order 13126. “Prohibition of Acquisition of Products Produced by Forced or  Indentured Child Labor,” was signed on June 12, 1999. The EO is intended  to ensure that federal agencies enforce laws relating to forced or indentured  child labor in the procurement process. It requires the Department of Labor, in  consultation with the Departments of State and Homeland Security, to publish  and maintain a list of products, by country of origin, which the three  Departments have a reasonable basis to believe, might have been mined, produced  or manufactured by forced or indentured child labor. Under the procurement  regulations implementing the Executive Order, federal contractors who supply  products on a list published by the Department of Labor must certify that they  have made a good faith effort to determine whether forced or indentured child  labor was used to produce the items listed.  Please see about link for detailed information.

There is a “mistake” on this order in regards to chocolate.  Cocoa  beans from The Ivory Coast and Nigeria is listed. Yet, companies like Hershey’s, Cargill and ADM to name a few who buy Ivory Coast cocoa beans still supply our federal government with their chocolate.  During my trip to capitol hill I found out why.  The federal government doesn’t buy cocoa beans, it buy it’s derivative product chocolate. If that ins’t a bunch smoke and mirrors malarkey, then what is?

We believe that in  order to be in line with its intention, these words need to be added: ”and its derivative products.”  If the big candy players can no longer sell to the feds, it would really wake them up.  Additionally, the bids for chocolate would go to ethical chocolate companies!!  What a great way to give them opportunity they deserve.

A powerful way to get our government in action is to appeal individually to our elected officials.  It seems that if we all write the exact same letter with the exact same subject line (email or written), at the same time, then the offices of our public servants have to take note. Addressing the “mistake” in Executive Order is something in their scope as a public servant.

It should take only about 15 minutes to send 3 emails. One to each of your Senators and one to your district Congressman on either Feb. the 13th or 14th. Here is a link that will lead you to the contact information of your politicians.  Below is the letter. Please spread the word it’s a numbers game at this point.  Thanks!!!!

THE LETTER WE SHOULD ALL USE:

Subject:  Put some love in Exec. Order 13126 this Valentine’s Day

Dear __________

As your constituent, I am writing you on behalf of DOL Executive Order 13126: “Prohibition of Acquisition of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor”, signed on June 12, 1999.   It’s wonderful that we live in a country concerned for the global welfare of children, unfortunately  there is a mistake on this order that needs to be fixed.

Currently, listed is cocoa from Cote d’ Ivoire and Nigeria. For this to have any effect at all I would like to see the words “and its derivative products” included on that line.  To my knowledge the federal government has never purchased raw cocoa beans, but it does, through procurement channels, purchase chocolate where the cocoa originated from the two countries in question.  I personally see no ethical difference between the raw beans and chocolate.

If your office is unfamiliar with the current situation regarding worst forms of child labor situation in West Africa, may I suggest you take a look at Tulane’s latest Report on the Harkin-Engel Protocol.

Adding “and its derivative products” will mean that our federal government will have to shift purchasing to smaller chocolate companies that only use ethically sourced cocoa.  I see that as a win for both the sake of the children and a bonus for the many small business that would love to have more opportunity for growth.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Slave Free Chocolate gets a new Platform

Featured

Out with the old antiquated website, in with the new one.  The old site had a ton on content on it which most will be moved over shortly. We are working on some changes with this new platform.  One being that we will have a much more effective How YOU can help area. Over the year we work one-on-one with individuals and small groups to help them design a campaign that works within their resources. For example, a high school student needing to do a report for current affairs can show Dark Side of Chocolate and pass out Fair Trade Chocolate along with their report.  A church group may send out letters to their elected officials or to some big candy companies.  Our experience over the years has allowed us to help create several templates that we soon have outlined on this site. This should all happen over the next few days.  Email isn’t working but please just contact us through Facebook or call us at 760-743-1127 (PST).  Thanks, Ayn Riggs-director.

Guy Andre-Kieffer

U Romano Roberto posted a tweet with a link to an article that Guy Andre-Kieffers’s body might have been found. I first learned of Guy Andre-Kieffer when reading Carol Off’s book, Bitter Chocolate: The Dark Side of the World’s most Seductive Sweet. In the cocoa slavery saga, Guy Andre-Kieffer, sticks out almost like an unbelievable Hollywood character. Apparently, he was colorful, smart, brazen, and risky.  His disappearance (he was kidnapped from a parking lot in The Ivory Coast in 2004) wasn’t a surprise to many of this colleagues.  I often imagine and sometimes address in public with the thought that if one were willing to make a Blood Diamondsesque movie, the main character is already set up.   Guy Andre-Kieffer was a French Canadian free lance journalist who resided sometimes in Canada, France and Africa. He often wrote in the genre of international commodities with a focus on West African cocoa.  While working on a piece about government corruption the reported kidnapping took place.  He was never seen again, nor has anybody been charged with his murder.  It’s now being reported that his body may have been found.  If you want to read more I suggest you read Bitter Chocolate.  Here are some links to various news stories of the last couple of days:

  • Vancouver Sun  ”Has missing jounalist been found in The Ivory Coast?”
  • The Canadian Press   ” Ivory Coast authorities find remains; may be missing Franco-Canadian journalist”
  • The Associated Press ”Ivory Coast finds Remains; Maybe Missing Reporter”

 

Cocoa financing Ivory Coast’s Gbagbo

This is an article that came out last year on Valentine’s Day about the hairy situation when Gbagbo was still in power.  If you remember there was an embargo on cocoa beans for a while.  If you are a corrupt leader in the first place with child labor issues right under your nose, I can’t imagine that a cocoa embargo would have a big effect unless you needed the money ASAP, which might be the case for Gbagbo  This article is from the Associate Press.

Critics: Chocolate financing Ivory Coast’s Gbagbo (AP) – Feb. 14, 2011

JOHANNESBURG (AP) — Some of the cocoa in that Valentine’s Day chocolate probably came from a West African country where the man in power for a decade is still clinging to office. And activists say consumers might also think twice if they knew unpaid 5-year-olds helped produce it.

This year human rights advocates are harnessing the political crisis in Ivory Coast, the world’s largest cocoa producer, to add momentum to an ongoing campaign to force the world’s chocolate makers to improve their labor practices.

Supporters of the internationally recognized winner of Ivory Coast’s election also have pushed for a cocoa ban in an effort to financially strangle incumbent leader Laurent Gbagbo, who the U.N. says lost the November election.

“It’s clear that the taxes that come from cocoa go directly to keeping Gbagbo in power. That’s why we called for an export ban and it seems to be working,” said Patrick Achi, spokesman for internationally recognized winner Alassane Ouattara, who is now trying to run the country from a hotel.

Years of campaigning by “fair trade” consumers already have forced chocolate makers to sign onto to agreements to help clean up the cocoa supply chain. But little has changed in the decade since the U.S. Congress passed the Harkin-Engel Protocol to introduce a “no child slavery” label for chocolate marketed in the United States.

Some 1.8 million children aged 5 to 17 years work on cocoa farms in Ivory Coast and Ghana, according to the fourth annual report produced by Tulane University under contract to the U.S. Department of Labor to monitor progress in the protocol.

The report says 40 percent of the 820,000 children working in cocoa in Ivory Coast are not enrolled in school, and only about 5 percent of the Ivorian children are paid for their work.

“These companies are getting incredible profits while often the farmers are getting really pennies,” said Emira Woods, co-director of Foreign Policy in Focus at the Institute for Policy Studies, a Washington-based think tank.

Campaigns recently have begun targeting The Hershey Company because it is the only major chocolate producer in the world that hasn’t made a commitment to use certified cocoa, activists say. Hershey’s, though, says it is working to improve lives in local communities.

“Our focus is on-the-ground programs that promote sustainable livelihoods in West Africa,” said Hershey’s spokesman Kirk Saville. “Hershey’s support for cocoa communities goes back more than 50 years. We have helped to develop more productive agriculture practices, to build educational and community resources and to eliminate exploitative labor practices.”

But the Tulane University report on child labor in cocoa farms in Ivory Coast and Ghana found chocolate makers have reached less than 4 percent of cocoa-growing communities in Ivory Coast and less than 14 percent of communities in Ghana.

“The industry has invested far more in programs in Ghana, where the worst abuses are not quite as prevalent as in the Ivory Coast,” said Timothy Newman, campaigns director of the Washington D.C.-based International Labor Rights Forum.

Newman also said children from the neighboring countries of Mali and Burkina Faso also continue to be trafficked to Ivorian farms, where 40 percent of the world’s cocoa is produced.

Ivorian government statistics indicate that more than 37,000 children are forced to work, according to the U.N. International Labor Organization’s Alexandre Soho, senior program officer for Africa on the elimination of child labor.

The industry says it has spent more than $75 million to support implementation of a cocoa certification system. However, the Tulane study found partners on the ground received only $5.5 million between 2001 and 2009, and that those working in Ivory Coast received only $1.2 million from the industry.

Activists argue that the answer is simple: pay farmers more and they will be able to afford to send their kids to school instead of to work. Most children are put to work on small family plots, often wielding dangerous tools like machetes and using hazardous substances such as insecticides.

But critics say that a chocolate boycott only hurts the farmers and their families, who are trying to make a living even if the wages are not “fair trade” ones.

“The essential problem from the very beginning, was that the large chocolate companies were hiding behind the Harkin-Engel Protocol which is an entirely voluntary agreement with no enforcement mechanism. As a result, they have been able to continually drag their feet in taking responsibility for labor rights abuses in their own cocoa supply chains,” Newman said.

“Many of the initiatives developed under this process have never addressed the critical underlying issues that lead to egregious labor rights abuses like the low prices paid to cocoa farmers for their beans and the lack of negotiating power that small-scale farmers have in the global chocolate supply chain. Problems like these continue to fuel abuse.”

Associated Press writer Marco Chown Oved contributed to this report from Abidjan, Ivory Coast.